![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Eli Lilly markets a wide range of prescription pharmaceuticals, infant formulas, child nutritional products, medical-imaging machinery, specialized wound dressings, and other medical supplies. Government regulations require a certain amount of animal testing for pharmaceuticals, but companies are afforded flexibility in choosing the tests that they use to establish the safety and effectiveness of new products. 2005 Resolution: Give the Animals 5PETA’s “Give the Animals 5” Campaign calls on companies to abandon five crude and cruel animal tests, replacing them with state-of-the-art and scientifically valid non-animal methods that are already in use in other countries. With the help of PETA supporters who hold stock in Eli Lilly, a resolution was filed in the fall of 2004, calling on the company to do the following:
Despite assurances that Eli Lilly only “uses animals in pre-clinical research to confirm the safety and efficacy of medicines when there are no alternatives,” the company took a position in opposition to our shareholder resolution. PETA’s resolution was brought to a vote at Eli Lilly’s annual meeting in Indianapolis, Indiana, on April 18, 2005. Approximately 9.2 million shares (1.2 percent) were voted in favor of the resolution. Although shareholder resolutions almost never win the required number of votes the first time that they are proposed, they do provide an opportunity to educate management, boards, and other shareholders about important issues, leading to change over the long term. 2006 Resolution: Animal Welfare PolicyIn 2006, PETA submitted another resolution to Eli Lilly, calling on the company to extend its animal welfare policy to include social and behavioral enrichment measures for the animals used and to ensure that any outside contract testing laboratories used comply with the policy. The resolution was largely the result of the horrors uncovered in the independent contract testing laboratory Covance Inc., whose officials boast that they have every major company as a client. Eli Lilly published our resolution in its proxy materials along with its opposition statement advising shareholders to vote against it. On April 24, 2006, a PETA representative traveled to Indianapolis, Indiana, to present our resolution at Lilly’s annual meeting. Our resolution garnered 3.9 percent of the vote (more than 30 million shares), which qualified it to be reintroduced in 2007.
|
|
l
|
| About PETA Privacy Policy PETA Web Sites |